Thursday, May 11, 2006

Costs of Big Government

Now, let's analyze those costs.  The government has been largely successful at a lot of things it does, so lets see if those successes are worth it.

The Federal Reserve's choice to print money has helped us avoid recessions.  The result, however, has been that the value of each dollar has significantly decreased.  This is why you can no longer go buy a turkey for 30 cents for thanksgiving, but now you pay upwards of $15.  Inflation is a very real issue in America today.

The US government's decision to support Israel has been successful.  One thing I didn't mention was that the US government also CREATED Israel.  Essentially, we chopped up the surrounding countries and stuck it in the middle.  It is located in the middle east, surrounded by middle eastern countries.  Strangely, now, those countries support the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11.  The cost of life has been largely ignored by the US government who continues to support Israel today.  Also, this is not the only cost.  Moreover, these major oil-producing countries formed an alliance (OPEC) that has drastically raised the cost of oil, and therefore gas, to what it is today.

Now, what about the government's alternative fuel.  With oil running over $70 per barrel today, surely this alternative fuel from coal will be useful.  This is, sadly, not the case.  The liquified coal, when it was originally created, ran $8000 per barrel to produce.  It is still a long way from being worth the money to produce and distribute.

Finally, let us analyze sin taxes and subsidies (taxpayer dollars to support  struggling businesses).  These two are best when combined because we don't have to get too confusing and detailed.

Primarily, subsidies have protected farmers (primarily family farms) from dying out when their product is less wanted, and sin taxes have discouraged the use of tobacco and alcohol.  Now, there are other unwanted effects, but lets examine this on these sole, successful grounds.

The unfortunate result has been that the government's excess taxes on cigarettes and alcohol, force tobacco and hops farmers near bankruptcy, so it takes our tax dollars and uses them to bail the farmers out.  So, you and I end up paying for them to produce a product that isn't selling.  I hope that's enough prove that politicians seem to miss the cost every time.

This ignorance of "unforseen" costs is ignored by politicians who still support these programs today.  The government has chosen to ignore the solution and recreate one through its own beaurocracy which results in further unforseen, unwanted, costs.  Essentially, the government does more than it should.  How much should it do?  We'll get to that soon.

If this isn't enough, and you want more on unforseen costs (or anything you don't understand) just drop a comment or email and I will do my best.


As you increase the cost of the license to practice medicine, you
increase the price at which the medical service must be sold and you
correspondingly decrease the number of people who can afford to buy the
service. – William Pusey, then president of the American Medical Association

When more of the people's sustenance is exacted through the form of
taxation than is necessary to meet the just obligations of government
and expenses of its economical administration, such exaction becomes
ruthless extortion and a violation of the fundamental principles of a
free government. – President Grover Cleveland

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

The limitations of Natural Rights

Those three beautiful Rights are very powerful.


None of these three can be lost without hurting another. Nothing can be added without weakening the others. Let's try it.

Health Care

Ok, so if Health Care is a Right, then where do we get the money...oh, from your property. There went property Rights. Let's try something else.


Again we run into the same issue. By guaranteeing food, the government has to pay for it from other people's money therefore violating their property Rights. Now, here's where things get interesting. Let's consider that the government is allowed to tax us to complete its goal of protecting these three Rights. Life, and Liberty, as we examined, come before property for a reason. People will gladly give up property for freedom or their lives. People will often give up freedom and property for their lives. Moreover, people will never give up their lives, except in rare cases desiring Liberty, for anything.

This is why Property is listed last, but adding anything else to the list violates it. Property is the finality of the list of Rights. Anything after it is worthless because it would violate the right to property (or liberty if you remember your last visit to the DMV). In any case, the 3 Natural Rights are a closed circuit. They cannot be added to or changed. This is why they are our ONLY three Rights.


It is not the business of government to make men virtuous or religious, or to preserve the fool from the consequences of his own folly. Government should be repressive no further than is necessary to secure liberty by protecting the equal rights of each from aggression on the part of others, and the moment governmental prohibitions extend beyond this line they are in danger of defeating the very ends they are intended to serve. – Henry George

The whole of the Bill [of Rights] is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals … It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of. – Albert Gallatin (1789)